Home page
SPONSOR AD

Topic: 1.94's or 2.02's ?

in Forum: C3 Engines

1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/27/08 9:26pm Message 1 of 7
Limited Member
Send PM
visalia, CA - USA
Joined: 10/27/2006
Posts: 641
Vette(s): 1981 red with silver interior,350(L-81), 350TH, glass t-tops, aluminium rims, 1980 Black/ Black int., 350 GM crate engine/350TH, 1976 black/ saddle int., L-82 w/headers, holly carb, Hypertech ignition
Here's the deal...... 1981 ,  I need to do head work ( valve guides, etc.) on the engine .   I have access to  both 194 (aprox. 1970 date codes), and 2.02  GM  fuelie heads ( 1969 date codes ).  The 194's are ready to go,  the 202's are in good shape but may need to be freshend up.   If I do nothing else but change the heads ,  how much more performance  will I get, if any, from the 202's  vs.  194's  vs.  rebuilding the stock '81 heads ?
The rest of the engine is stock....... Whats your thoughts ? 



SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)

1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/28/08 7:01am Message 2 of 7
Profile Pic
Lifetime MemberLifetime Member
Send PM
HOWELL, NJ - USA
Joined: 5/18/2004
Posts: 6812
Vette(s): 1979, Targa Blue (72 Color), Pace Car rear spoiler, L88 hood, Dark blue factory interior, 525HP 406, HD 700R4, 370 gears,Steeroids, composite rear spring, TT IIs wrapped in T/A Radials.

202s will help it breathe better, however, if you have the stock 1981 cam (mild lift) and exhaust manifolds, you may not see much of a noticable difference.

Also, make sure the fuelie heads have all the accessory holes that you need for AC, alt, etc.
 
Good luck!
 
Paul



LukesVette Homepage
Veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom
101st Airborne(AirAssault!)
God Bless America

Support Our Troops


     

1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/28/08 8:05am Message 3 of 7
Former Member
Send PM
Mounds View, MN - USA
Joined: 5/24/2007
Posts: 1031
Vette(s): 70 LT1 coupe, 69 350 HP coupe, 69 390HP 427 coupe, 71 LS5 convert, 85 coupe, 93 coupe
The casting numbers are more important than date codes.  Get the numbers from your current heads and both sets of replacements, and look on line for flow numbers.  If you are going to spend any money on repairs, you might look at new Vortec heads instead.  But Paul is right.  Your current cam is very mild, and I am not sure how restrictive '81 exhaust is.  If you are only going to do the heads, I would do whatever is most cost-effective.

Larry



1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/28/08 10:48am Message 4 of 7
Profile Pic
Lifetime MemberLifetime Member
Moderator
Send PM
Duncanville, TX - USA
Joined: 11/8/2003
Posts: 20214
Vette(s): #1-1974 L-48 4spd Cp Med Red Metallic/Black deluxe int w/AC/tilt/tele./p/w-p/b/ Am-Fm/map light National/Regional/Chapter NCRS "Top Flight" #2-1985 Bright Red/Carmine Cp.L-98/auto Member: NCRS, NCRS Texas, Corvette Legends of Texas
If someone is trying to sell you some "fuelie" heads with '69 dates....yer gettin scammed. The last fuelies were made in '65.
Not to say they aren't the same castings, and valve sizes, but that in itself doesn't make them "fuelie" heads.
The valve sizes really won't make much noticeable difference on your engine, as Paul and Larry have said. If you do go with the 2.02 heads, tho, you'll be able to bump up the cam and pistons later on, and have some good heads to work with those mods.
If you don't plan on any major mods later on, then stick with the smaller valve heads...


Joel Adams
C3VR Lifetime Member #56    

My Link


(click for Texas-sized view!)
             NCRS

"Money can't buy happiness -- but somehow it's more comforting to cry in a CORVETTE than in a Kia"

1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/28/08 2:22pm Message 5 of 7
Limited Member
Send PM
visalia, CA - USA
Joined: 10/27/2006
Posts: 641
Vette(s): 1981 red with silver interior,350(L-81), 350TH, glass t-tops, aluminium rims, 1980 Black/ Black int., 350 GM crate engine/350TH, 1976 black/ saddle int., L-82 w/headers, holly carb, Hypertech ignition
Thanks guys !  good info .  


1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/28/08 3:21pm Message 6 of 7
Profile Pic
Lifetime MemberLifetime Member
Send PM
SHELBYVILLE, TN - USA
Joined: 7/5/2002
Posts: 3942
Vette(s): 1976 L48 auto

1978 L82 4speed

1994 LT1 6speed
you'll probably also notice if they are smaller combustion chamber heads(which most likely they are being from 69-70 era) that you're compression will also go up a bit, along with the redline rpm... on dad's vette, before doing any mods to the engine, i had gotten a set of double hump heads with small valves, the 1.94.. the heads were 300 horse, 1966 date.. just a straight replacement of heads, with the stock heads(1976), i notice a considerable increase in the top end rpm(not to mention some more hp at the wheel)... best i recall(was like, 12-14 years ago) i gained about 1500 or more top rpm's... and, i'm sure it would still pull higher, i was just a bit timid about pushing any further... didnt have a back up vette at that time :)


StingrayJim
NCM Lifetime Member #1936

Stingray's '76���������������������������� StingrayJr's '78���������������������������Lil Red '94

(click each one to see a bigger version)

1.94's or 2.02's ?

Posted: 10/28/08 4:25pm Message 7 of 7
Former Member
Send PM
Canada
Joined: 6/23/2008
Posts: 558
Vette(s): 1972, 1980
I put on a set of 202 heads just for the better flow, ported/hogged them didn't really notice any performance differences though, if you do change keep your old number matching heads.
John



in Forum: C3 Engines


SPONSOR AD: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)