Home page
SPONSOR AD

Topic: Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

in Forum: C3 Engines

Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 1/29/08 1:07am Message 1 of 8
Former Member
Send PM
Anywhere, WI - USA
Joined: 1/19/2008
Posts: 10
Vette(s): 1969 350/350 4 spd convertible. Cortez Silver with Gunmetal Interior.
Anyone out there have any idea how an original LT-1 intake compares to a modern intake like an Edelbrock??  Just to keep it fair, it all has to fit under a stock big block '68- '72 hood with a Holley 650 or comparable carb.
 
The LT-1 was a potent package but how does it compare to a modern version of the same carburated package?  Especially if it involves a high compression engine?
 
 



SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)

Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 1/29/08 5:07am Message 2 of 8
Profile Pic
Former Member
Send PM
Tucson, AZ - USA
Joined: 10/7/2007
Posts: 341
Vette(s): 1970 White L-46 Air Roadster, 1971 White LT1 Coupe, 1971 Red Auto Air Coupe, 383 stroker, 430 HP, 2002 Millennium Yellow Auto Coupe
This is my opinion, I don't have all the engineering specs for this answer, but I am sure they are out there.
 
The snowflake intake is 35+ year old technology. It was used as a performance package along with the Holley carb on an LT1. Was it a better intake that the stock intake, yes. Are there intake/carb combinations out there that will out perform 35 year old technology, YES. I guess it all boils down to what you want to accomplish.




Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 1/29/08 10:53am Message 3 of 8
Former Member
Send PM
Horse Cave, KY - USA
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 488
Vette(s): 1968 convertible; 1980 L-82
The original GM LT-1 intake manifold is one of the better intakes GM ever came up with.
 
Smile



Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 1/29/08 11:27am Message 4 of 8
Profile Pic
Former Member
Send PM
Frederick, MD - USA
Joined: 9/8/2003
Posts: 3398
Vette(s): 1969 convertible L71 427/435 4-speed black interior
I have always understood the LT-1 intake is excellent.  That being said, the LT-1 engine as a whole was a high rpm engine.  It lived for the upper rpm range where it makes its best power.  A modern intake might move the torque range down to a lower range where you actually drive on the street but give up some upper range performance.

It all depends on what you want out of the engine.



Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 1/29/08 8:29pm Message 5 of 8
Profile Pic
Lifetime MemberLifetime Member
Moderator
Send PM
Duncanville, TX - USA
Joined: 11/8/2003
Posts: 20214
Vette(s): #1-1974 L-48 4spd Cp Med Red Metallic/Black deluxe int w/AC/tilt/tele./p/w-p/b/ Am-Fm/map light National/Regional/Chapter NCRS "Top Flight" #2-1985 Bright Red/Carmine Cp.L-98/auto Member: NCRS, NCRS Texas, Corvette Legends of Texas
As 6880Mike stated, the LT-1 intake is still considered one the THE best small block intakes ever made. There are other, newer designs that work better in different ranges, as Gunslinger points out. It really does depend on what you want to do, and how you want to drive.


Joel Adams
C3VR Lifetime Member #56    

My Link


(click for Texas-sized view!)
             NCRS

"Money can't buy happiness -- but somehow it's more comforting to cry in a CORVETTE than in a Kia"

Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 1/29/08 8:42pm Message 6 of 8
Former Member
Send PM
Mounds View, MN - USA
Joined: 5/24/2007
Posts: 1031
Vette(s): 70 LT1 coupe, 69 350 HP coupe, 69 390HP 427 coupe, 71 LS5 convert, 85 coupe, 93 coupe
Those who mentioned 35 year old technology are right on.  It was on eof the better manifolds of it's time, but the new manifolds will make at least as much power over a broader RPM band.

On the other hand, it is pretty sexy to say you have a correct LT1 manifold.  I am still looking for a correct 70 LT1 manifold.



Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 2/3/08 2:48am Message 7 of 8
Former Member
Send PM
Anywhere, WI - USA
Joined: 1/19/2008
Posts: 10
Vette(s): 1969 350/350 4 spd convertible. Cortez Silver with Gunmetal Interior.
"On the other hand, it is pretty sexy to say you have a correct LT1 manifold.  I am still looking for a correct 70 LT1 manifold."
 
The irony of course is that its 1970 Z-28 intake on a '69 350/350 Vette.
 
"Those who mentioned 35 year old technology are right on.  It was on eof the better manifolds of it's time, but the new manifolds will make at least as much power over a broader RPM band." 
 
So since its not original would I be better off changing it out for a modern Edelbrock manifold?  Granted that the best thing to do would be to change the heads to match (although I do have 2.02 heads) but then thats a REAL can of worms (that ends with buying a C6).
 
And yes, it is definitely a high rpm package.



Original LT-1 intake vs Modern Technology?

Posted: 2/3/08 6:15am Message 8 of 8
Profile Pic
Lifetime MemberLifetime Member
Send PM
HOWELL, NJ - USA
Joined: 5/18/2004
Posts: 6812
Vette(s): 1979, Targa Blue (72 Color), Pace Car rear spoiler, L88 hood, Dark blue factory interior, 525HP 406, HD 700R4, 370 gears,Steeroids, composite rear spring, TT IIs wrapped in T/A Radials.
If you're building the car for power with other modern parts, there are certainly newer manifolds that match the more modern cam grinds and heads.
 
Although I've got to tell you, I had a snowflake manifold on a .030 over 350 in a 69 Malibu with stock heads and a comp cams 280H and that sucker screamed!!! I don't know that an Edelbrock or Holley would have made too muck of a difference....
 
Really comes doew to technology vs leagacy, history, conversation piece that still delivers decent performance......personally, I'd go legacy on a street carCool
 
Good luck with whatever you decideThumbs%20Up



LukesVette Homepage
Veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom
101st Airborne(AirAssault!)
God Bless America

Support Our Troops


     

in Forum: C3 Engines


SPONSOR AD: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)