Topic: Rochester Qjet vs. Holley spreadbore
in Forum: C3 Fuel, Emission Control, and Exhaust Systems
Already a Member?
Click Here to Login
Not yet a Member?
Click Here to Register for Free!
Former Member
Send PM
Houston, TX - USA
Joined: 2/7/2008
Posts: 93
Vette(s): 1970 454 4 speed A/C power everything else
Thanks,
This one is a 650 cfm ,4165 (I think) it has a 6210 part number. Right now I'm having problems with the Qjet.........so I was considering trying the Holley.
SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)
I initially switched my Q-jet out for a Holley 4175 spread bore (vac secondaries). Main reason was that the Q jet needed new primary shaft bushings in addition to the rebuild so I sent it out for work. I had rebuild the holley (took my best guess on the power valve and jets) and retro fitted an electric choke.
Bottom line is that I wish I had never bothered. I got the Q-jet back right away and with a little fine tuning on the jets and primary rods, the part throttle response was far superior to the Holley (even though I think the holley's jet were close). Maybe with some more tuning, the Holley would have worked out better, but the only advantage I could see was that fuel was always at the ready with those big float bowls (car would always start on the first crank of the starter).
Bottom line is that I wish I had never bothered. I got the Q-jet back right away and with a little fine tuning on the jets and primary rods, the part throttle response was far superior to the Holley (even though I think the holley's jet were close). Maybe with some more tuning, the Holley would have worked out better, but the only advantage I could see was that fuel was always at the ready with those big float bowls (car would always start on the first crank of the starter).
in Forum: C3 Fuel, Emission Control, and Exhaust Systems
SPONSOR AD: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)