Home page
SPONSOR AD SPONSOR AD

Topic: 1968 or a 1974?

in Forum: C3 General Discussion


1968 or a 1974?

Posted: 8/5/04 7:27am Message 21 of 23
Profile Pic
Lifetime MemberLifetime Member
Moderator
Send PM
CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH - USA
Joined: 12/2/2003
Posts: 6424
Vette(s): 1975 C3 Red, T-Tops, Black Interior. All I need is time and money! Getting there!
73 is actually my favorite. Just me.
It's too bad our budget limits our choices. I LOVE THEM ALL |bouncy| |bouncy| |bouncy|


SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)

1968 or a 1974?

Posted: 8/5/04 2:50pm Message 22 of 23
Former Member
Send PM
KERNERSVILLE, NC - USA
Joined: 1/13/2004
Posts: 1355
Vette(s): 1968 L-71 convertible
I had a '73 and loved it, slightly modified, I referred to '73's as the last of the chrome bumper cars.
Didn't have as many bumpers, but still had 'em! |thumb|


1968 or a 1974?

Posted: 8/6/04 11:27am Message 23 of 23
Former Member
Send PM
Orland Park, IL - USA
Joined: 11/14/2003
Posts: 43
Vette(s): 1973 TT custom pearl orange paint 355 ci, modified Turbo 400, 3.55 rear end, R134a air, balanced & blueprinted custom engine work, deluxe black interior
Maybe too late for another comment, but you might want to consider the "rule of fours" as published in Corvette Fever a couple of years ago. The article stated that any Vette year ending in four was somehow destined to be looked down upon (and thus less valuable) than other years. They provided statistics about the '54, '64, '74, '84 and indications about the '94. My vote would be to stay with the '68. Of course I'm partial to chrome bumpers (even if mine only has them on the back.) Of course you could always do what the guy in the latest classic car show did -- claims his car is a '72 but has a full opening front and no chrome bumpers on either end. Maybe there is something about living too close to nuclear power plants, besides the glow in the dark fish that is. |laugh| |laugh| |laugh|


in Forum: C3 General Discussion


SPONSOR AD: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)