Topic: New Coil over kit from Vansteel
in Forum: C3 Handling Components
Already a Member?
Click Here to Login
Not yet a Member?
Click Here to Register for Free!
Anyone check out the new rear coil over kit from Vansteel? Any opinions?
SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)
Looks interesting. Thanks for info. What does it look like installed?

Steve, Lifetime Member #129
74 coupe 4 speed 350, 54K actual miles,
all original; paint, interior, engine,
split bumper. #'s match. 2nd owner, no stress cracks.
Hmmmmmm... I think its a great idea, but why ( i've never measured) couldnt you just put the coilovers on the exsisting T-arms the way it's setup now ? I'm sure the shock mounts have to be reinforced and the T-am too...

Moderator
Duncanville, TX - USA
Joined: 11/8/2003
Posts: 20215
Vette(s): #1-1974 L-48 4spd Cp Med Red Metallic/Black deluxe int w/AC/tilt/tele./p/w-p/b/
Am-Fm/map light National/Regional/Chapter NCRS "Top Flight"
#2-1985 Bright Red/Carmine Cp.L-98/auto
Member: NCRS, NCRS Texas, Corvette Legends of Texas
Those T-arms look like they weigh a ton!
I'm sure they're stout enough to hold the weight of the car, tho.
There's one thing, tho...the positioning of the lower shock mount on the t-arm looks to me like the weight of the car would push on the mount, and twist the t-arm out at the bottom, giving some serious camber problems, or at the least, some real stress on the camber rods/bushings, not to mention the twist on the t-arm itself.
Then again, I imagine these things have been taken into account in the design...

There's one thing, tho...the positioning of the lower shock mount on the t-arm looks to me like the weight of the car would push on the mount, and twist the t-arm out at the bottom, giving some serious camber problems, or at the least, some real stress on the camber rods/bushings, not to mention the twist on the t-arm itself.
Then again, I imagine these things have been taken into account in the design...

Joel Adams
C3VR Lifetime Member #56
My Link
(click for Texas-sized view!) NCRS
"Money can't buy happiness -- but somehow it's more comforting to cry in a CORVETTE than in a Kia"
Is this what Zora would have wanted?



Moderator
Duncanville, TX - USA
Joined: 11/8/2003
Posts: 20215
Vette(s): #1-1974 L-48 4spd Cp Med Red Metallic/Black deluxe int w/AC/tilt/tele./p/w-p/b/
Am-Fm/map light National/Regional/Chapter NCRS "Top Flight"
#2-1985 Bright Red/Carmine Cp.L-98/auto
Member: NCRS, NCRS Texas, Corvette Legends of Texas
[QUOTE=Ghengis Jon] Is this what Zora would have wanted?
[/QUOTE]
Actually, yeah....he wanted coils in the rear, but there was just no room for them. GM wouldn't shell out for coil-overs, either. I have to think that Zora's final design would have been better than this, tho...imo

Actually, yeah....he wanted coils in the rear, but there was just no room for them. GM wouldn't shell out for coil-overs, either. I have to think that Zora's final design would have been better than this, tho...imo

Joel Adams
C3VR Lifetime Member #56
My Link
(click for Texas-sized view!) NCRS
"Money can't buy happiness -- but somehow it's more comforting to cry in a CORVETTE than in a Kia"

Joined: 9/8/2005
Posts: 241
Vette(s): 1980 with a Banks Twin Turbo
1969 Convert Big Block
1996 Grand Sport Convert
Hello all, if anybody has a Speed Direct Catalog ( the Steeroids People) it has a Picture of an Experimental and or Preproduction Coilover Setup that is way Diffrent. The Sping Shock setups are laying Flat where the Original Spring goes. Sorry I checked there Web Site and can't find it. It looks like a Pretty good Setup I'm just not Conviced that a Steel Coil is better than a Fiberglass Spring and since our Cars are among the very Few that You can Use Fiberglass why Not. Richard.....
in Forum: C3 Handling Components
SPONSOR AD: (Our Sponsors help support C3VR)