Joel Adams
C3VR Lifetime Member #56
My Link
(click for Texas-sized view!) NCRS
"Money can't buy happiness -- but somehow it's more comforting to cry in a CORVETTE than in a Kia"
Interesting, my Corvette by the numbers book doesn't show that #.
I'll look again. I'd bet with 2 vettes with the same number, my book ain't right!
Thanks Jack!
this site might help
Jack,
If your M-22 was made in June of 1969, when was your car built?
Any chance the factory made a mistake & substituted the M-22 instead of the M-21?
Joel,
The M-22's ratios in '69 were--2.20/1.64/1.28 & 1-1
Anthony
Dave,
I agree that the M-22 is probably a replacement, but you have to admit that the transmission date and the car build date (about 2 months apart) are close enough to make an argument in either direction.
That is unless there is no stamped VIN or if it is different, then there in no possiility of a mistake on the line.
Either way, that's a great find Jack!
Anthony
Jack,
I misread your postings on another thread. I thought your trim tag said August. So much for that train of thinking.
Hope to see ya @ the Chatterbox this summer.
Anthony
P= Muncie
8= 1968
D= April
11= 11th day of the month (April)
There were no outside markings (A,B,C) to indiate M-20, M-21, or M-22 until 1969. All 3 used the same case with the same casting #'s.
Your VIN should be stamped to theleft of these numbers, if it is the original tranny.